Skip to main content
logo  ST. CHARLES PARISH, LA
File #: 2011-0342    Version: 1 Name: Request the Corps revisit the method by which compensatory ratios are considered in the Modified Charleston Method
Type: Resolution Status: Approved
File created: 11/7/2011 In control: Parish Council
On agenda: Final action: 11/7/2011
Enactment date: 11/7/2011 Enactment #: 5861
Title: A resolution to request that the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi Valley New Orleans, revisit the method by which compensatory ratios are considered in the Modified Charleston Method, especially in regard to projects involving flood protection and restoration.
Sponsors: V.J. St. Pierre Jr.
Indexes: Floods, U.S. Corps (Miscellaneous)
Attachments: 1. 2011-0342 Final Reso 5861
2011-0342
INTRODUCED BY: V.J. ST. PIERRE, JR., PARISH PRESIDENT
RESOLUTION NO.
Title
A resolution to request that the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi Valley New Orleans, revisit the method by which compensatory ratios are considered in the Modified Charleston Method, especially in regard to projects involving flood protection and restoration.
Body
WHEREAS, due to the extreme impact of subsidence and loss of coastal wetlands and barrier islands in the lower Mississippi Delta levee protection is more important and time critical than ever in order to preserve the unique culture, resources, and industry found throughout the region; and,
WHEREAS, levee projects, designed to protect the public from flooding, are often faced with unavoidable impacts to wetlands; and,
WHEREAS, as such, Parishes are required to provide compensatory mitigation in accordance with state and federal statutes, regulations and/or guidelines; and,
WHEREAS, Parishes are required to spend an ever increasing portion of construction budgets on mitigation in lieu of actual project construction; and,
WHEREAS, effective May 1, 2011, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, Mississippi Valley New Orleans adopted a new method of determining compensatory mitigation called the Modified Charleston Method; and,
WHEREAS, the Parish agrees with the Corps of Engineers stated intent of adopting this less subjective method of calculating required mitigation as compared to the previous methodology, however, the adoption of the Modified Charleston Method by the Corps has in most instances dramatically increased the costs associated with evaluation of impacts on our vital flood protection projects, thereby reducing the Parishes ability to properly protect the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT WE, THE MEMBERS OF THE ST. CHARLES PARISH COUNCIL AND THE PARISH PRESIDENT, do hereby request the United States Army Corps of Engineers revisit the method by which compensatory ...

Click here for full text